Sorry if I have this totally wrong, but with WordPress.com, I understand I need three subscriptions to run three blogs. However, if I use SiteGround, I can run three blogs on one subscription. Why does SiteGround appear to offer so much better value for money?
Thanks
Hello there! It’s true that WordPress.com requires separate memberships for each blog unless you choose one of their eCommerce or Business plans, which still have some restrictions. You may manage several blogs under a single hosting package with SiteGround (or most other self-hosting platforms), which is a cost-effective option. You also have greater authority over the websites!
You’ve got it! WordPress.com charges per site because they’re essentially managing all the hosting and security for you. SiteGround, on the other hand, gives you a lot more freedom and flexibility, especially if you want to run multiple blogs. Just be prepared for a bit more work on the technical side!
That is not at all incorrect! Since WordPress.com takes care of everything, each site needs its own membership. You have greater control with SiteGround because you only pay for server space and can host as many websites as you like (up to the restrictions of your plan). It’s undoubtedly more affordable, but you’ll have to handle security, upgrades, and other things.
You got it right! WordPress.com simplifies things but at a higher price, while SiteGround allows you to host multiple blogs on a single plan, making it more affordable. Just be prepared for a little more hands-on management. SiteGround has great support, though, so it’s worth the value!
Indeed, in that regard, SiteGround offers greater value. When using WordPress.com, you essentially pay for the convenience of having everything taken care of for you, but SiteGround is far more affordable and allows for more DIY work. I use SiteGround for several of my blogs, and it’s been a wise decision. Definitely something to think about if you don’t mind a little additional setup.
The functionalities of WordPress.com are restricted. You may use every function if you host it on a hosting company like SG. SG is a fantastic choice for hosting WordPress; they offer excellent technical help, but be cautious about their renewal fees since they might be rather expensive. Asphostportal is another option for you to think about; I personally use them because they are less expensive.
That’s not wrong at all! WordPress.com’s pricing is based on their managed services, while with SiteGround, you’re paying for the hosting itself and can run several blogs under one account. If you’re cool with managing your own backups and updates, SiteGround gives you a lot more bang for your buck!