AI generated blog content

Im sure someone else has explored this already so id like to ask to save myself some effort.

id like to know what people experience is with AI generated blog content.

ive had feedback that AI generated content ranks high in SEO initially, but then it drops. this is a fair hypothesis… id like to know what could be the result of daily rotating AI content.

my blog is about my app. so its a pretty uncompetitive niche. my “blog-posts” are more like documentation. i have tried it enough to know that with some bullet-points, i can get AI to generate coherent documentation.

i think search engines are favorable to regularly updated content. i can have AI regenerate the content daily.

what could be the result of this for SEO, AdSense anything else im not considering?

Since you’re creating dry copy, using AI to handle it is definitely acceptable in your case.

Google claims that it only rewards material that is helpful and does not punish or prioritise AI content for being AI. Thus, based in part on user response, I interpret it to mean that it is evaluated using the same metrics as other material.

Therefore, AI copy employed in an environment where people anticipate wit and personality is unlikely to strike many important signals and thus won’t actually rank. However, what about comprehensive documentation that explains how something operates? If it is straightforward and coherent, as you suggest, the user will find it helpful.

Reliable AI detectors do not exist. so long as your writing is interesting. The AI material on my several sites, which have a variety of content, is performing really well. superior than material created by humans.

I don’t think employing AI exclusively to write your posts is a good idea if you want to be in the blogging business for the long run.

Google is likely to find plagiarism in your material since you can’t have the concept for this content and yet be the only one in your sector who does. AI-generated answers don’t really stand out. I mean, content that is entirely handwritten can occasionally be identified as plagiarised. Therefore, I would advise against taking that path. There is no turning back once things go south, even if you start out with respectable results.

If you’re producing a user manual, utilise AI to create the framework for it and then expand upon it. In any case, you will need to follow all the instructions.

Explain why your app is superior in comparative articles. After that, write on both your personal and other users’ experiences. That would be more beneficial and long-lasting.

All of my writing has been entering conversation. Although AI has aided me, it did not come up with my stories. In an effort to write as much in my native tongue as possible, I have been working with it. Every concept and story is based on real events in my life. If utilised properly, it may be a fantastic method to make your story come to life.

Google will claim that AI is not penalised. Furthermore, AI detectors will make you question if you’re an AI or really human. But AI cannot perform the effort primarily to make it relevant.

  1. AI isn’t creative.

  2. Even after giving AI 10 points on brand voice, it still can’t sound like you.

  3. The content you have will be duplicated by someone else. You’re not competitive now, but not always.

Thus, I think it’s bad to use AI to produce stuff. Then, where can you apply it?

  1. grammar review

  2. Paraphrasing

  3. Coming up with topics and subtopics to talk about that you could overlook (it won’t be novel, but human beings are prone to overlooking things)

  4. Constructing examples based on the information you have